DO YOU DOWNLOAD MUSIC?
Do you or have you ever downloaded copyrighted
songs for free from the Internet? If you answered "yes," then as far
as the recording industry is concerned, you are a thief. Downloading
copyrighted music to be played on your computer or burned to a CD
without paying for the music is stealing. So why are there so many
fine upstanding individuals ripping the music industry off? One reason
seems to be that it's easy to do so as the proliferation of free music
download sites continue to appear. The other most quoted reason is
that fans are disgruntled over the fact that they must purchase an
entire album to obtain the one or two hit songs they want to hear.
In the olden days when 45 records were king,
fans could buy the individual hit songs they wanted to hear for a
song. The flip side usually contained some throwaway selection but who
cared? The song you wanted was available for a couple of bucks and if
for some reason you wanted more, you could then buy the artist's more
costly 33 LP album. In today's CD world, there is really nothing
comparable to the 45. Yes there have been some attempts to produce
physically smaller single hit CDs that still play in any CD player.
But for whatever reason, they haven't proved to be a marketing
success. So fans are forced to shell out the $20 or more to buy the
full artist album.
And even when you do buy the albums, you are
still left with dozens of CDs that have just the one or two songs you
want to hear. So most music lovers copy the songs they want and burn
them to their own CDs creating a single disk that contains only the
songs they enjoy, in the order they want them to play. And with MP3
compression, you can store hundreds of songs on a single disk as
opposed to the 13 or so titles you can fit on an ordinary CD
All of these technological advantages combined
with the convenience of not having to go to a record store can
overwhelm an individual's motivation to remain an honest consumer. And
it seems to me that industry attempts at finding a solution to the
problem via legislation and encryption technologies are not the
answer. Blocking the electronic distribution of music is at best a
Band-Aid and will not stem tide of fans making illegal copies. Trying
to shame fans via TV commercials that feature recording artists asking
viewers not to steal their songs are also doomed to failure. What is
needed is a better marketing model.
There have been several successful test
marketing schemes that seem to work. One of the most popular is having
a distribution center that lets fans download their choice of music
selections for 99 cents a song. Once a song is downloaded, the
purchaser can save the song to the computer's hard drive, burn it to a
CD or transfer it to an MP3 player. Working in cooperation with the
recording artists and their labels, these test sites have worked so
well that in many instances, the servers handling the service quickly
became overloaded and had to be reset to only serve certain regional
areas as a way of limiting the huge number of download demands.
Rather than spending millions on ad campaigns,
encryption schemes and the like, the recording industry should spend
their time and efforts on more productive ways to find successful
marketing solutions such as those offered by the 99 cents a song
distribution model. The successful marketing model will give fans
access to the music they want to hear along with the way they want to
hear it, and the recording industry will get their compensations.