APPLE'S SAFARI IS A TRIP
Does the world need yet another Internet
browser? If you use a Windows based PC, you have many choices starting
with the leader of the pack, Microsoft's Internet Explorer. Or you can
elect to use the former market leader, Netscape. Or you can take your
pick from other browsers such as Opera and Mozilla. If you own a
Macintosh, your choices begin to move along the same path. All of the
aforementioned browsers are available on the Mac platform but as of
this month, Apple owners are being offered a new choice.
Apple's brand new Internet browser is is called
"Safari" and it met with an enthusiastic response by the attending
audience as it was unveiled by Apple's CEO Steve Jobs at Macworld. But
I remember when Microsoft's browser was greeted with a similar
enthusiasm when it was unveiled. And Microsoft's browser supports all
of Apple's newest technology such as the Quartz rendering system found
in its latest iteration of OS X that yields an even crisper visual
display of text and graphics. So why is Apple reinventing the wheel?
According to many pundits, the reason is mostly technical rather than
political. Safari is based on the newest technology available and
Apple is going to build on what they consider to be the best at this
point in time.
Looking at the browser so far, I like what I
see. Safari is in what is called a "Public Beta' which means that it
is not a finished product. Apple has released it to the public to get
user feedback, ideas and suggestions as to how it may be improved.
Apple has included a "bug" button in the upper right-hand corner. If
something fails to operate properly or you have a suggestion regarding
Safari's operation, clicking on the button gives you a form in which
you can file your opinions and observations directly to Apple.
In a side by side comparison, I found Safari to
be generally faster then the Macintosh version of Internet Explorer.
The browser launched more quickly, rendered web pages faster and was
generally more responsive. The layout of the screen is also more
intuitive and less cluttered. You can shuffle and arrange your
favorites on the page by simply clicking and dragging them left or
right. Creating a new bookmark displays a naming sheet that lets you
edit or enter a different name than the web page name. At that point
you can decide if it goes on the bookmarks bar or in any of the
pull-down menu's library folders.
One of the exclusive new and useful features is
called SnapBack. Let's say that after browsing for a while, you begin
searching for a web page. As you continue to go from link to link, you
decide that your search has taken a wrong turn. Normally, you would
have to hit the Back button over and over again to get back to where
you started. But SnapBack acts like a breadcrumb trail. Clicking on
the button immediately brings you back to where you started your
search by returning you to the point where you last typed an address
or selected a bookmark. This is one feature that will save you
countless clicks and hair pulling.
Most everyone I know uses Google. I've gone on
record as saying that I use the Google search engine more than any
other. Evidently that sentiment is shared by Safari's developers as
Safari contains its own Google search field right next to the web
address.
Currently the public beta will only import
bookmarks from Microsoft's Internet Explorer but Apple has implied
that the final version will import bookmarks from other browsers as
well. If not, I'm sure that utilities will appear to import and export
most all of your information between your current browser and Safari.
Other features include pop-up ad suppression, and seamless downloads
where Safari cleans up after itself after a downloading a file. All
that's left is the file itself and not the compressed version.
So does the Mac community have room for yet
another browser? Given what I've seen so far and factor in that it's
from and supported by Apple, I'd say that's a big "yes."